by Ron Surz
Many are familiar with the “January effect,” which is the tendency for the stock market to perform well in January. There’s a new “January effect.” The best performing month is now December. Also, there’s a less well known “September effect” that distinguishes September as the worst performing month. Will September of 2015 conform to a history of disappointment?
As shown in the table and graphs below, the month of September stands out as being the most likely to disappoint. Here are some observations:
- September’s 0.7% average loss is not only the lowest return; it’s the only month with a negative average return.
- Unlike the other 11 months, September is as likely to produce a negative return as it is to produce a positive return. September earns positive returns about half the time. All of the other months have a history of positive returns 60% or more of the time.
- September’s worst return – losing 29.7% in 1931—is the worst of the worst. Some think October is the worst month because they remember the 21.5% loss in 1987, but this was not the worst month ever.
- September’s best return – earning 16.7% in 1939 – is far below the average of the best returns, at 21.3%, although it is median.
So why is September such a nasty month? I’d like to hear your opinions, especially regarding your outlook for this September. Here’s my opinion. I think it’s due to the fact that investors are done with their vacations, so they’re back at their desks trading, and mucking things up. Maybe they’re just plain ornery coming back to work, but it’s more likely that they simply increase volatility. In his 1999 book, The Beast on Wall Street, Dr Robert Haugen documents the fact that market volatility is mostly driven by investor behavior. Specifically he shows that there is only a weak connection between major events and market swings. Little has happened historically on the days of big market swings, and the stock market response has been ho-hum on big event days.
A related explanation is that investors start their tax loss harvesting in September, to get ahead of the end-of-year crowd. This would represent the flip side of the “January effect” which is caused by investors buying back the stocks they sold for tax purposes. It would also explain why December has replaced January as the best performing month. Note that December has produced positive returns 78.7% of the time; worth betting on.
If my explanation is correct, this September is likely to disappoint because investors will be back at their trading desks, but history tells us that it is a coin-flip probability – worse than the other 11 months but not all that predictable.
Let me know what you think regarding your outlook for this September.
To learn more about Ron Surz, visit PPCA, Inc.
Other posts from Ron Surz
You’d think that the notoriety of the Madoff Ponzi scheme would have sensitized investors to fraudsters, but investors...
We’re broke and no one seems to care. We’re all aware that this country owes a lot of...
Doing nothing is hard to do – you never know when you are finished. Leslie Nielsen Introduction If...